<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ionadas local LLC &#187; Borrell Associates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ionadas.com/tag/borrell-associates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ionadas.com</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization and Social Media for Local Businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:21:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Economics of Search Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.ionadas.com/1/economics-of-search-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ionadas.com/1/economics-of-search-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Combs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Borrell Associates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ionadas.midasnetworks.com/wordpress/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Early in June, Borrell Associates published its <a href="http://www.borrellassociates.com/index.php/reports/details/94/6/reports/economics-of-search-marketing-jun-'09">&#8220;Economics of Search Marketing&#8221; report</a>. It discusses some of the challenges of search marketing for small businesses, both for the advertiser and the service provider.</p>
<p>One particular quote stood out to me:</p>
<blockquote><p>This [margin to the service provider] changes with the higher levels of spending by the advertiser. Our model, based on interviews with advertisers and resellers, indicates that at the highest levels of spending &#8211; above $50,000 per month &#8211; an</p></blockquote><p>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early in June, Borrell Associates published its <a href="http://www.borrellassociates.com/index.php/reports/details/94/6/reports/economics-of-search-marketing-jun-'09">&#8220;Economics of Search Marketing&#8221; report</a>. It discusses some of the challenges of search marketing for small businesses, both for the advertiser and the service provider.</p>
<p>One particular quote stood out to me:</p>
<blockquote><p>This [margin to the service provider] changes with the higher levels of spending by the advertiser. Our model, based on interviews with advertisers and resellers, indicates that at the highest levels of spending &#8211; above $50,000 per month &#8211; an advertiser will see 89% to 94% of the expenditure applied toward keyword purchases. Conversely, those spending the lowest amounts see less than half their dollars used to purchase keywords.</p></blockquote>
<p>These numbers certainly agree with what I&#8217;ve seen in the industry, and they bolster something I&#8217;ve been saying for years: if you&#8217;re company or market do not support a budget of at least several thousand per month, you&#8217;re better off not outsourcing your paid search campaigns.</p>
<p>Outsourcing of marketing campaigns results in increased overhead and expense. If you&#8217;re spending $5,000 or more per month with Google, Yahoo and Bing, it might make sense to avail yourself of the expertise a paid search agency can bring.</p>
<p>However, for many locally focused advertisers, the keyword volume for your market might not support a budget of more than a few hundred per month. In these cases, the overhead of outsourcing the paid search management makes doing so not viable.</p>
<p>You need to manage the campaigns yourself, although training and outside assistance might be needed on the front end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ionadas.com/1/economics-of-search-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

